Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 20:03:31 +0200 (MEST) From: Dmitri Goloubkov To: Sergey Shuvalov Cc: Irina Matchikhilian , Dmitri Goloubkov Subject: rp0501: test runs 2003 calibration Dear Sergey and Irina, the two new ECSN calibrations (20882,40) and (21013,40) have been included into TEST keybook 104 (KEYBOOK 104 /key_table_TEST keytable) and i reconstructed the two runs 20922, 21061 with repro-5 executable and kumac. The DST/MINI files have been archived to /acs/test/data/REAL/03/exp04/*/run20922/rp0501_run20922* /acs/test/data/REAL/03/exp04/*/run21061/rp0501_run21061* or can be accessed through corresponding run catalogue. Best regards, D. _____________ P.S. a reminder: 1) rp0501 data is available trough corresponding run catalogues: IOFILE MINI_IN_EDIR $HBROOT/DATAMGR/.rp0501_RunCatalog ! GI or IOFILE DST_IN_EDIR $HBROOT/DATAMGR/.rp0501_RunCatalog ! GI 2) one has to use dCache (no `IO/DCACHE OFF' in the kumac!) 3) one has to add /acs/test to Arte's file-search path in the kumac: io/fpath '/hb/mini*:/acs/test' On Wed, 5 May 2004, Sergey Shuvalov wrote: > Dear Dima, > It seems there is a problem with ECAL calibration > in 2003. > 2 calibration periods, corresponding to ECSN tables > (20882,30) and (21013,30) unfortunately show about 5% > deviation from the nominal value for Middle and > Outer ECAL sections. The reason is not clear, but > one thing is obvious: in 2002 we had regular > MB runs and we did calibration based on them, for 2003 > period there were no MB runs at all and we had used some > specific runs with different trigger conditions and of > course different pi0 spectra. > Now we had corrected the calibration and we urgently > need a couple of runs to check the new calibration, > namely runs 20922 and 21061 to be once more reprocessed. > Could you please do it for us? After this check we can > discuss what to do next, it could be well be that for > all 2003 data one more reprocessing is required. > With best regards, > Irina, Sergey > >